Pregnancy households do ' bankruptcy ' determining principles my father.

The determination of the parents for the child will change

Next to the fret about the General variables in the process made the pregnancy households as commercialized ... the regime admitted to thai households will surely do "bust" principles determining the parents was specified in article 63 of law on marriage and family.

Under current rules, the "child born during the marriage or by the wife during the pregnancy that is the common children of the spouses". In case the parents are not admitted to the evidence and must be determined by the courts.

Photo illustrations.

So, when no default processing all cases were pregnant older due to the wife was born during the marriage are "naturally" is the child of the couple. The deny if there is proof and must have proof of authentication.

However, next time when that plan to get pregnant are admitted, then this rule will no longer exist. Because children born during the marriage, but is the "pregnancy" certainly will not, of course, is the common children of the spouses.

Pregnancy doesn't have to compensate households

Although certain processing pregnancy households are recognised towards the humanitarian purposes and not accept what the commercialization or in other words the ' surrogacy ". But this does not mean the pregnancy thanks to households are not intended for pregnant households little remuneration to fostering the health and care of the fetus in the abdomen. Fostering in a certain level is almost unavoidable.

The problem arises in the case of pregnancy results not as expected then pregnant households have to compensate or reimburse what got for people thanks to or not? And the assumption as to the compensation claim?

Case of dispute on the issue of compensation that were pregnant in the jurisdiction of the Court or not is a question is left very much disturbed.

The draft law on marriage and the family plan this time taken on a very new rules is "pregnancy because humanitarian purposes". This provision derives from the actual needs in the life of society in our country, there are a lot of families have only sons that his wife could not breed when in traditional culture in the us appreciate the childbirth connection track.

The reality in many places, especially in the South of the hospital, there are many single sent to the hospital with leadership aspirations thanks to pregnant households, but the doctor refused because the law is not yet available. Many doctors tell me when reading the many simple leaves have weep by the situation got le, mercy.

Thus they have petitions should fix the law allows "the pregnancy because humanitarian purposes". As I need to allow this because it is a humanitarian solution, it helps for those rare couples later could not lay a normal way to have children to foster care, the woman is motherhood.

Mr. Yang Hui Post-Director of civil law-economy (Ministry of Justice).=

  • 570 Views
Loading...