In law through the view of men ... not in law

(Phunutoday)-I would support, then later had a son, also advised me in man that cared for his wife, and his parents, "take care of each other", see do not, or just bluffing to mouth fucking ...[links]

Photo illustrations

Hello readers! I myself is a man, but I never endorsed the man in man. To me, the man in the law despite any reason whatever is less despicable people and effeminate. The lack of resolution, and didn't do. These people not only value for man but also a shame for our men. By why I say so then you think, man, is the pillar of the family who has the right to food, the right to say so then what excuse we HA to listen to his wife, according to his wife to go home to his wife, brother-in-law lived in chui hit my shit "chui ROAR kitchen cabinet" to attempting to forward the cause quiet, warm? So frankly lazy workers, like loose creativity, dramatic people, ... Behind the two words in the law that is both an advantage, premeditation, drawn to the large property blocks from House wives, by most I see these families are all daughters and parents are old. In fact, many cases in society also have proven this. If so, then it's not worth the face man?. You're embarrassing us men by the despicable, less edge, attempt, service your benefits.

Men don't let my wife squeezed

Two is the effeminate English to know what is new you should insult bearing his face went to the home of his wife to stay, is also to ask reliable thanks to a shadow of her family for he was disengaged the plate. To all the must listen to the wife and family of his wife, he became the figurehead, effeminate, and has no role in the House. And put everything to his wife, want to pimp an affair, entice anywhere. And depending on his wife's parents, provided they serve, while his parents, the neglect of a child, so not worthy. Shame and misfortune for fathers, mothers would produce such men. She would support, then later had a son, also advised me in man that cared for his wife, and his parents, "take care of each other", see do not, or just bluffing for happy mouth. The sisters also do not think that I said such loss of equity, with the reason being "That my parents?". I always explain, she is a woman, that woman then took her husband to follow her husband, served her husband's parents, that is responsible. The instrument has been the sentence, "the bride is my brother-in-law, a guest". Can anyone catch his balm is not ever serve guests, while she was the then served her husband's parents nursing is right. Therefore, I myself own, despite starvation, or go begging to live at home rather than also I never think about going to his wife's parents at home. Although the House had inlaid in gold, inlaid jewel I well never have thought drawn to, and for me not to let a woman can pierced my nose. Like you're so humiliating, so you think it not humiliating our men anymore. Sijo.=

  • 9622 Views
Loading...